Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition was accorded; the petition was dismissed as having been withdrawn, with subsequent miscellaneous petitions stood disposed of as infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition was accorded and it was dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
C.R.P. No. 4440 of 2010
DATE: 08.06.2016
Between:
P. Sulochanamma and six others .. Petitioners And
P. Venkateswarlu and another .. Respondents
O R D E R:-
The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a letter dated 07.06.2016 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
Permission is accorded.
Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J 08.06.2016
bcj
P. Sulochanamma and six others
P. Venkateswarlu and another
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
