This revision petition challenged the lower court's refusal to admit original documents after the trial. The High Court held that since a copy was filed earlier and no valid explanation for its delay was provided, the appeal against the dismissal was rejected.
No costs. Miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MSRJ C.R.P.No.4343 of 2016
1
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
C.R.P.No.4343 of 2016
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
MSRJ C.R.P.No.4343 of 2016
2
Attendance Certificate dt.11-06-2015 issued by Health Officer, Municipal Corporation, Rajahmundry.
MSRJ C.R.P.No.4343 of 2016
3
recently traced and therefore opportunity should be given to the petitioner to file them in the Court.
MSRJ C.R.P.No.4343 of 2016
4
costs.
shall stand closed.
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 23-12-2016 kvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the single-judge court committed an error of jurisdiction in refusing the petitioner a final opportunity to produce original documents missing when the Written Statement was filed.
Whether a copy of a document filed with the Written Statement satisfies the requirement of producing the original during the trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
