Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the criminal revision. Permission was accorded, and the revision was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the revision was granted; the revision was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.944 OF 2013
ORDER:
This revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order, dated 19-03-2013 passed in Crl.M.P.No.7 of 2013 in S.C.No.138 of 2011 by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhimavaram.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to permit the petitioners to withdraw the revision. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this revision shall stand closed.
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J DATED: 21.03.2016. Hsd
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
