The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed as infructuous since the main suit (O.S.No.24 of 2011) was disposed of as not pressed by the parties, with nothing surviving for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.176 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed questioning order dated 01.02.2012 in I.A.No.804 of 2011 in O.S.No.24 of 2011 on the file of Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram.
2. Appellant herein is plaintiff, who filed I.A.No.804 of 2011 before the Court below seeking temporary injunction and the Court below on a consideration of material on record dismissed the application and vacated temporary injunction granted on 14.06.2011. Aggrieved by the same, present appeal is preferred.
3. As per the office note, the suit before Court below was dismissed as not pressed in view of the memo filed by both parties. As the main suit itself is disposed of, nothing survives in this appeal.
4. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
__________________ S. RAVI KUMAR, J
mar
5th July 2016.
Appellant (Plaintiff)
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
