Defendant appellant against interim injunction order dismissed for non-prosecution despite suit disposal below.
No order as to costs; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.86 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is preferred against order dated 31.10.2011 in I.A.No.149 of 2011 in O.S.No.4 of 2011 on the file of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Plaintiff filed the above referred suit for specific performance of contract and in that suit consequential relief of injunction is prayed restraining the defendant from alienating the property. Plaintiff filed I.A.No.149 of 2011 for interim relief of injunction. The Court below, on a consideration of material on record, granted injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit schedule property pending disposal of the suit. Aggrieved by the said order, defendant preferred the present appeal.
As seen from the office note, the main suit O.S.No.4 of 2011 was disposed of on 18.06.2014. As the suit itself was disposed of on 18.06.2014, nothing remains in this appeal for adjudication. In spite of posting this matter under the caption ‘Specially Identified Cases’, no interest is evinced in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
S. RAVI KUMAR, J
JULY 04, 2016 YVL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.86 of 2012
Date: 04.07.2016
YVL
Defendant
Plaintiff
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
