Order closing C.C. No. 2283 of 2015 and noting that disposal is based on endorsement without examining prior order performance; petitioner may work out separate remedy.
C.C. closed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
C.C.No.2283 OF 2015
ORDER:
In view of the endorsement dated 17.02.2016, I am not inclined to examine whether there is any disobedience of order dated 22.09.2014 in W.P. No.23950 of 2009.
It is needless to observe that endorsement is issued in terms of the order of this Court and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the endorsement, the petitioner is free to work out remedy within the four corners of law.
C.C. is closed. No order as to costs.
S.V.BHATT, J
Date:08.03.2016
Stp
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
