The High Court permitted an appellant to withdraw the appeal suit in A.S. No. 738 of 2002. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
Permission to withdraw appeal suit; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
A.S. No. 738 of 2002
DATE: 09.06.2016
Between:
Aipala Venkataramaiah and another .. Appellants And
E. Venkateswarlu and 18 others .. Respondents
JUDGMENT:-
Sri N. Gangadhar, Advocate, representing Sri S.Ashok Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal Suit.
Permission is accorded.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as having been withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Appeal Suit, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J 09.06.2016
bcj
Aipala Venkataramaiah
E. Venkateswarlu and 18 others
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
