Disposed

P. Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary

Telangana HC12 Aug 2015WP/967/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch of writ petitions was disposed of on the ground that they raised same issues as in W.P.No.1426 of 2012 disposed earlier on 29.07.2015. Directions in the earlier order applied, and pending miscellaneous petitions were disposed of as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Directions in earlier order in W.P.No.1426 of 2012 applied; pending miscellaneous petitions disposed as infructuous.

P. Venkateswara Rao Vs The Government… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA

¶2

PRADESH

¶3

CASE NO. W.P.Nos.9464, 11165, 11167, 11170, 11173, 18582, 20206, 21985, 21989, 31101, 31152, 31166 of 2010, 967, 7150, 15755, 28549 of 2011 and 7026, 12251, 12418, 12800 and 27351 of 2012

¶4

Between:

¶5

Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Limited, Hyderabad and others .. Petitioners and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 12.08.2015

¶6

SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

¶7

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

¶8

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?	Yes/No
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?	Yes/No
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?	Yes/No

¶9

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

¶10

W.P.Nos.9464, 11165, 11167, 11170, 11173, 18582, 20206, 21985, 21989, 31101, 31152, 31166 of 2010, 967, 7150, 15755, 28549 of 2011 and 7026, 12251, 12418, 12800 and 27351 of 2012

¶11

12.08.2015

¶12

W.P.No.9464 of 2010:

¶13

Between:

¶14

Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Limited, Hyderabad

¶15

.. Petitioner and

¶16

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. K.V.Subba Reddy

¶18

Counsel for respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce

¶19

Counsel for respondent No.2: Government Pleader for Mines and Geology

¶20

Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 6: Government Pleader

¶21

for Finance and Planning Counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5: Government Pleader

¶22

for Irrigation and Command Area Development The Court made the following:

¶23

COMMON ORDER:

¶24

This batch of writ petitions is filed aggrieved by the levy of one time penalty on the seigniorage charges stated to have been deducted by the respective departments from the respective bills of the petitioners under the contracts only on the ground that valid permits for transportation and utilization of sand for such contract works were not procured/produced by the petitioners.

¶25

At the hearing, it is agreed among the learned counsel for the parties that on 29.07.2015, this Court disposed of a batch of Writ Petitions, viz., W.P.No.1426 of 2012 and batch, following its earlier order, dated 15.11.2012, in W.P.No.17998 of 2012.

¶26

For the same reasons as contained in the abovementioned order, dated 29.07.2015, in W.P.No.1426 of 2012 and batch, these Writ Petitions are also disposed of in terms thereof with the direction that the observations and directions contained therein shall form part of this order.

¶27

As a sequel to disposal of these Writ Petitions, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in these writ petitions shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

¶28

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

¶29

12^th August, 2015 GHN

P. Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Lingam Goud, Vs M/s Vishweshwara Finance and Chit Funds (P) Limited

P. Lingamgoud, Vs M/s Vishweshwara Finance and Chit Funds (P) Limited

Rayalaseema Thermal Power Project, Vs The Authority Appointed Under the Minimum Wages Act

The Anantapur Co-operative Town Bank employees Association, Vs The Registrar of Co-operative Socities

Vpr-Rk-Mrkr(Jv), Vs The Director of Mines and Geology

M/s. R.K.Infra Corp. Private Limited, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Secretary