The Acting Chief Justice dismissed a writ petition without taking up the merits, noting the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 9031 of 2002
Dt:25.11.2015
Between:
D.Nagaratnamma.
… Petitioners And The The State of A.P. and others. … Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 9031 of 2002
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner. Heard learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3.
With the passage of time, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in
prosecuting this writ petition further and hence, nobody is coming forward to work it out on merits. In the circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:25.11.2015
kdl
D.Nagaratnamma
The State of A.P.
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
