Eslavathu Saibaba v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order disposing of writ petitions without substantive reasoning as rendered infructuous.
Order disposing of writ petitions without substantive reasoning as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.6246, 7201, 7329, 7676, 7856, 8057, 8257, 8305, 8348 and 8563 of 2015
Dt:05.06.2015
Between:
M/s.Sammakka Sarakka Girijana Labour Contract Mutually Aidied Co-operative Limited and another.
… Petitioners
And
The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Law & Justice (Legislative Department), New Delhi and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.6246, 7201, 7329, 7676, 7856, 8057, 8257, 8305, 8348 and 8563 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that all the writ petitions have rendered infructuous.
Writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:05.06.2015
kdl
M/s. Sammakka Sarakka Girijana Labour Contract Mutually Aidied Co-operative Limited and another
The Union of India
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court