The court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition filed for the production of Kotagiri Rajashekar as infructuous, noting that he had already been placed in judicial custody by a Magistrate following a criminal charge.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 14295 of 2015
Dt:05.06.2015
Between: B.Purushotham. And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 14295 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This Habeas Corpus petition seeks production of one Kotagiri Rajashekar alleging that respondent Nos.3 and 4 have detained him illegally.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the writ
petition, Kotagiri Rajashekar is shown as accused in the crime and the order of judicial custody has been passed by the Magistrate.
In view thereof and that being so, in our opinion, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:05.06.2015
kdl
B.Purushotham
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
Kotagiri Rajashekar
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
