Writ petition challenged the validity of Telangana Ordinance No.1 of 2015 and a consequential memo. The High Court ordered notice to the Advocate General and maintained the status quo of the Market Committee's functioning until further orders.
Notice issued to Advocate General; status quo of Market Committee functioning maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY , THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI KALYAN JYOTHI SENGUPATA THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WP .NO:4763 of 2015
Between:
Kundena Raju S/o. Vittal
..... Petitioner
AND
Tankbund, Hyderabad.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of first respondent in issuing Telangana Ordinance No.1 of 2015 dated 13.02.2015 and consequential Memo No.954/MKT.I/2015-1 dated 14.02.2015 of the second respondent as null and void apart from being arbitrary, illegal, violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and set aside the same.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in herein and upon hearing the arguments of SMT K.V. RAJASREE Advocate for the Petitioner, GP for Legal Affairs, Legislative Affairs (TG) for Respondent No.1, GP for Agricultural (TG) for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. and of Sri K. Upender Reddy, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.4, the Court made the following.
ORDER:
Since the Ordinance has been challenged, notice shall be issued to the learned Advocate General of the State of Telangana.
Status quo, as on today with regard to the functioning of the Market Committee, shall be maintained until further orders.
Post along with WP No.3882 of 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
5. Two CC to GP for Legal Affairs, Legislative Affairs (TG), High Court, Hyderabad (OUT)
6. Two CC to GP for Agriculutre (TG), High Court, Hyderabad (OUT)
7. One CC to SMT K.V. RAJASREE Advocate (OPUC)
8. One spare copy.
Tvr
HIGH COURT
HCJ & SKJ
ORDER
DATED: 27-02-2015
WP NO.4763 OF 2015
POST ALONG WITH WP NO.3882 OF 2015
STATUS QUO
DRAFTED: TVR DATED: 02-03-2015
HIGH COURT
HCJ & SKJ
ORDER
DATED: 27-02-2015
WP NO.4763 OF 2015
POST ALONG WITH WP NO.3882 OF 2015
STATUS QUO
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the Telangana Ordinance No.1 of 2015 and consequential Memo as null and void.
Whether the functioning of the Market Committee should be maintained on status quo.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kundena Raju
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Legal Affairs, Legislative Affairs and Justice, Law Department
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Agriculture & Cooperation
The Commissioner & Director of Agricultural Marketing (Telangana)
The Person In charge & Assistant Director of Marketing, Medak
Kalyan Jyothi Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
