This writ appeal was dismissed by the High Court for non-prosecution. Counsel for the appellants indicated an inability to proceed, leading to the order without further hearing.
This writ appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1191 of 2014
P.C: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
This writ appeal was adjourned on several occasions so far. On 06.04.2015, when it was called out, at the request of some Advocate holding for Mr.B.Narayana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants, we passed over the matter as a last chance. Today, once again, similar request is made, to which learned counsel for the respondents has strongly objected to.
When we asked Mr. K.L.N.Raghavendra Reddy, learned Advocate holding for Mr.B.Narayana Reddy, whether he is ready to go on with the matter, he expressed his inability.
Hence, we are constrained to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B.BHOSALE,J
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO,J
Dt:07.04.2015
kdl
Dilip B.Bhosale
A.Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
