Allowed

Varam Srinivasulu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department

Telangana HC22 Dec 2015WP/41581/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order is a routine disposal of two writ petitions filed regarding the refusal of registration of land transfer documents by the 5th respondent. The court directed the respondent to either register the documents or record reasons for refusal under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, relying on a previous judgment.

What did the court decide?

The 5th respondent is directed to receive and process the documents for registration or refuse them by recording reasons under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.

Varam Srinivasulu, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.41581 of 2015

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard.

¶5

2. The petitioner states that in the land reforms proceedings, the determination of excess land was finally decided by this Court in C.R.P.No.4046 of 1982, dated 10.02.1987, wherein the land held by the petitioner was substantially reduced. Hence, as a consequence, the excess land which was obtained under Surrender was re-transferred to the petitioner vide proceedings of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Adoni, in C.C.No.2009/PKD/75, dated 30.10.2010, and the said order specifically transfers the lands admeasuring Ac. Ac. 21.99 cents in Survey No.624/1 in Machapuram Village, Ac. 10.94 cents in Survey No.206/1 and Ac. 09.13 cents in Survey No.167 in Kapatralla Village. The petitioner intends to sell these three lands and stated to have presented the entire document to the 5^th respondent. However, he declined to receive and process the said document. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.

¶6

3. The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.16909 of 2015, dated 15.06.2015.

¶7

4. In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the 5^th respondent to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner for registration in relation to the subject property. In the event the 5^th respondent is of the opinion that the document warrants refusal of registration, he shall pass appropriate orders duly recording the reasons for such refusal in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. If, however, the document is found to be complied with

¶8

all legal requirements, he shall register the same and release it in accordance with due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶9

JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶10

22^nd December, 2015

¶11

¶12

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶13

WRIT PETITION No.41455 of 2015

¶14

22^nd December, 2015

¶15

Varam Srinivasulu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Varam Srinivasulu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Pramila Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Punganuru Venkata Ramana, Vs The Principal Secretary (Revenue)

Talatam Satyakumari Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Gummadi Mangamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Lekkala Tulasi Babu, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh rep by the Principal Secretary

Nawajish Sultan All Virani, S/o Late Sultan Ali Hussain Vs State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary