The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed two writ petitions as infructuous after counsel submitted that the subject matter no longer survived for adjudication. Earlier interim orders were vacated.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
W.P.No.39189 & 39293 of 2012
W.P.No.39189 of 2012
Between: Md. Farooq The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 4 others
And
… Petitioner/Appellant (s)
… Respondent (s)
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 11.08.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
1 Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No
may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2 Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No
marked to Law Reports/Journals
3 Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see Yes/No
the fair copy of the Judgment?
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.39189 & 39293 OF 2012
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petitions no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Any interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J Date: 11.08.2015 dv
Md. Farooq
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 4 others
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
