Writ petition challenging inaction on road repair. Court noted work entrusted to contractor via Work Order dated 13.01.2015 and disposed of the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.35432 of 2012
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:
“to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the official respondents in not repairing the public road, as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and also in contravention to the Grampanchayat layout No.405, dated 01.07.1970 and sanction vide HUDA No.2518/P4/H/07, dated 29.03.2007 and GHMC town planning, Kukatpally No.BA/G1/591/1138, dated 30.03.2007….”
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3, Sri Y.Rama Rao, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.4 and Sri M.S.N.Prasad, learned counsel for respondent No.6.
Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3/Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation submits that already tenders were called for and work was entrusted to the contractor vide Work Order No.D17140031301/EE/Division14/DB/GHMC/2014-15 dated 13.01.2015. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
Date: 10-08-2015
pab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
*********
WRIT PETITION No.35432 of 2012
Between:
Sai Sagar Enclave Welfare Association, Secunderabad and 16 others
… Petitioners and The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Hyderabad and five others … Respondents DATE OF JUDGEMENT PRONOUNCED: 10-08-2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
Yes/No
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No 3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Sai Sagar Enclave Welfare Association, Secunderabad and 16 others
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Hyderabad and five others
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
