Petitioner challenged the termination of her temporary fair price shop authorization. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the vacancy was filled on a permanent basis before judgment, removing the cause for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
CASE NO. W.P.No.36839 of 2012
Between:
Smt.Goddumarri Surekha
.. Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Collector, Civil Supplies Department, Kadapa and others
.. Respondents
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 13.08.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.36839 of 2012
13.08.2015
Between: Smt.Goddumarri Surekha
.. Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Collector, Civil Supplies Department, Kadapa and others
.. Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Ms.P.Radhika Counsel for the respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare proceedings, dated 19.11.2012, of respondent No.2 terminating the petitioner’s temporary fair price shop authorization in Bukkapatnam Village without notice as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP), on instructions, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, a notification was issued and the vacancy of fair price shop dealership of Bukkapatnam Village, in which the petitioner was temporarily working as the fair price shop dealer, was filled up on permanent basis.
In the light of the above subsequent event, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.46758 of 2012 filed by the petitioner for interim relief shall stand dismissed as infructuous.
__________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
13th August, 2015 GHN
Smt.Goddumarri Surekha
The State of Andhra Pradesh
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
