The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is provided in this one-line order.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN
Present
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26140 of 2014
Between:
Dr. Mrs. Sultana Begum Khan, W/o. Yousuf Khan, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Lecturer in English Anwar Ul-Uloom Degree College, Mallepally, Hyderabad – 500 001, Telangana State.
.. Petitioner
AND
Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education (CE.II) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 2 others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26140 of 2014
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 15th December, 2015
KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26140 of 2014
Date: 15th December, 2015
KL
Dr. Mrs. Sultana Begum Khan
Government of Telangana
P.NAVIN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
