The petitioner, Standing Counsel for respondents submitted suspension order revoked making petition infructuous. Court dismissed writ as infructuous. No costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 18622 OF 2015
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents that the order of suspension, which was the subject matter of the Writ Petition, was subsequently revoked and in view of the same, the Writ Petition has become infructuous and no further orders are necessary.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 15.12.2015 KA
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
