This is a two-line order dismissing the writ petition as infructuous with consequential disposal of miscellaneous petitions.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 30587 of 2014
Dt:26.10.2015
Between:
P.Pashupathinath and others.
… Petitioners
And
The Government of Telangana and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 30587 of 2014
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned counsel holding for Mr.Nageswar Rao Palle, Advocate on record for the petitioners, submits that with the passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:26.10.2015 kdl
P.Pashupathinath and others
The Government of Telangana and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
