Petitioner instructed counsel to withdraw writ petitions following a Supreme Court judgment. The High Court disposed of both petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Writ Petition Nos.271& 272 of 2015
DATED:12.06.2015
Writ Petition No. 271 of 2015
Between: Smt. Kaniganti Hamsaveni, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And
The Union of India, Represented by its Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, New Delhi and others.
….Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Writ Petition Nos.271& 272 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. V.V. Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the writ petitions, submits that in view of the subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court, he has instructions to withdraw the writ petitions.
The writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
12th June, 2015
Pnb
Smt. Kaniganti Hamsaveni
The Union of India
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
