This two judge bench disposed of W.A.No.460 of 2015 by applying the judgment dated 26.09.2014 in W.A.No.749 of 2014. The disposal was facilitated as the respondent had suffered the same order in a batch of appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
W.A.No.460 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard Mr.S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant.
Mr.S.Ravi, at the outset, invited our attention to the order dated 06.04.2015 passed in W.A.No.137 of 2015 and submitted that the instant writ appeal may also be disposed of in terms of the said order. The order dated 06.04.2014 reads thus:
“This writ appeal is directed against the common order dated 15.04.2014 disposing o f several writ petitions including Writ Petition No.20877 of 2013 filed by respondent No.1. Against this order, several writ appeals were filed and they were heard and disposed of by the Division Bench vide judgment dated 26.09.2014 in Writ Appeal No.749 of 2014 and the batch.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this writ appeal may also be disposed of in terms of the common judgment dated 26.09.2014. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 also joins him in making such request.
In the circumstances, the instant writ appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 26.09.2014 passed in Writ Appeal No.749 of 2014 and the batch.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.”
None appears for respondent No.1, though served.
Respondent No.1 was petitioner in W.P.No.21524 of 2013.
Our attention was invited to the order of the Division Bench dated 26.09.2014 in W.A.No.749 of 2014 and the batch, and also to the cause title of W.A.No.766 of 2014 in particular. From the title of W.A.No.766 of 2014, it is clear that respondent No.1 therein and the present respondent No.1 is one and the same. This shows that respondent No.1 has also suffered the order dated 26.09.2014 passed in the batch of writ appeals. This seems to be the reason why respondent No.1 or her advocate on record is not coming forward to workout this appeal. In view thereof, we dispose of this appeal also in terms of the order dated 06.04.2015 passed in W.A.No.137 of 2015.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed
of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V.BHATT, J
Date: 11.06.2015
Stp/Lrkm
Appellant (unnamed)
Respondent No.1 (unnamed)
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
