High Court dismissed Writ Petition for non-prosecution. No legal representation appeared for the petitioner, and the court found the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the matter further.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions disposed of. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.23460 of 2004
DATED: 23.11.2015
Between:
Smt. Gadiraju Bhadramma
… Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh and others
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.23460 of 2004
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner.
We have perused the prayer in the Writ Petition and the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, in particular, paragraph 9 thereof. Keeping that in view, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this petition further and hence, no one is coming forward to work it out on merits.
Hence, Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
23rd NOVEMBER, 2015.
S. RAVI KUMAR, J
kvni
Smt. Gadiraju Bhadramma
The State of Andhra Pradesh
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
