Dismissed

Tatikonda Brahma Lingaswamy, v. The Commissioner of Endowments

Telangana HC25 Jun 2015WP/18774/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed membership in a temple founder's family and sought car allowance for which he had filed a representation in 2014 that remained pending. The court disposed of the writ petition directing the Commissioner of Endowments to decide the representation within four weeks without addressing merits.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Commissioner of Endowments to consider the pending representation and decide within four weeks.

Tatikonda Brahma Lingaswamy, Vs The Commissioner of… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.18774 of 2015

¶3

Dated : 25.06.2015

¶4

Between:

¶5

Tatikonda Brahma Lingaswamy, S/o.Nagaraju, Aged about 48 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.3-91, M/s.Aswini General Merchants, Vysya Street, Vasavinagar, Krishna Devipet road, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad & 2 others

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following :

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.18774 of 2015

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

The petitioner claims to be the member of founder’s family of Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Narsipatnam Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. The petitioner claims to have submitted an application on 28.10.2014 to the Commissioner, Endowments Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, requesting to sanction car allowance in accordance with the scheme formulated by the State providing such allowance. The grievance of the petitioner necessiating institution of this writ petition is that even though, the said representation was made on 28.10.2014, so far no orders are passed. The petitioner has placed on record a circular issued on 30.11.2011 providing the said benefit.

¶14

2. In view of the fact that the representation stated to have been submitted by the petitioner on 28.10.2014 is pending, this Writ Petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits directing the Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad (1^st respondent), to consider the said representation and take a decision as warranted by law and communicate the same to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶16

25^th June, 2015

¶17

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶18

Rds

Tatikonda Brahma Lingaswamy, v. The Commissioner of Endowments

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tatikonda Brahma Lingaswamy, v. The Commissioner of Endowments

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Pushpa, Vs The Government of Telangana

S. Vijaya Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sharda Bai W/o Deendayal Agarwal, Vs State of Telangana

K.Dhananjaya Naidu Vs Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary

Sri M. Rajaiah Gupta Vs The Commissioner

L. Narender Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal