Disposed

K. Pushpa, v. The Government of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Jun 2015WP/18506/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking permission to construct houses. The court held that applications lacked the prescribed date and did not follow the required proforma, but granted liberty to re-submit compliant applications so the respondent must decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; liberty granted to submit compliant applications for respondent Gram Panchayat to consider within four weeks.

K. Pushpa, Vs The Government of Telangana — Specific Performance | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.18506 of 2015

¶3

Dated : 24.06.2015

¶4

Between:

¶5

K.Pushpa, W/o. Krishna, Aged about 43 years, Occu:Labour, r/o.Plot No.49, Survey No.62/1, Medipally Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and others.

¶6

…. Petitioners

¶7

And The Government of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another.

¶8

…. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following :

¶10

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.18506 of 2015

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

Petitioners claim to be the residents of Medipally village, Ghatkesar mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They own house plots in Sy.No.62/1 of Medipalli Village. Lay out was approved by the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority (HUDA) on

¶14

01.04.2000. Petitioners have submitted applications for grant of permission to construct houses in the plots owned by them on 10.02.2015, but so far no permission is granted. Hence, this writ petition.

¶15

2. Learned standing counsel submits that so called applications submitted by the petitioners do not contain the date on which said applications were submitted and the same were also not in accordance with the proforma prescribed in Form-G appended to the A.P.Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and Building ) Rules, 2002 (for short, ‘Rules, 2002’).

¶16

3. Since the petitioners have not submitted applications in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the Rules 2002, it cannot be said that the respondent Gram panchayt has acted illegally in not considering the so called applications submitted by the petitioners.

¶17

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to submit their applications in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Rules 2002 and as and when such applications made, the same shall be considered by the respondentGram Panchayat within a period of four weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶19

JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶20

Date: 24.06.2015 kkm

¶21

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶22

kkm

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.18506 of 2015

¶24

Dated : 24.06.2015

K. Pushpa, v. The Government of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Pushpa, v. The Government of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pati Bhikshapathy Vs The State of Telangana

Tamatam Vijaya Kumar Goud Vs The State of Telangana

V.Dastagiri ,Dudekula Vannurappagari Dastagiri, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S. Vijaya Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sharda Bai W/o Deendayal Agarwal, Vs State of Telangana

Gandikota Sravan Kumar, Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh rep by its