Gandikota Sravan Kumar, Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh rep by its

According to the petitioner, land to an extent of Acs.8.21 cents in R.S.No.278/1, Jaggaiahpeta Village belongs to Seetha Rama Swamy and Anjaneya Swamy temples. The petitioner alleges that unscrupulous persons

¶10

are selling away the temple lands and having come to know about the same, the petitioner complained to the District Collector, Krishna on 23.03.2015 to look into the matter and to protect the lands belonging to the temples. As no orders have been passed on the said representation, this writ petition has been filed.

¶11

Though the petitioner alleged that some people are selling away the properties belonging to the temples, since the representation stated to have been made by him is pending consideration before the District Collector, this Writ Petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion on merits and directing the 2^nd respondent to pass orders on the said representation, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

¶12

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶13

___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J June 24^th , 2015. ssp

Gandikota Sravan Kumar, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh rep by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gandikota Sravan Kumar, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh rep by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pati Bhikshapathy Vs The State of Telangana

Tamatam Vijaya Kumar Goud Vs The State of Telangana

V.Dastagiri ,Dudekula Vannurappagari Dastagiri, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Pushpa, Vs The Government of Telangana

S. Vijaya Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sharda Bai W/o Deendayal Agarwal, Vs State of Telangana