The High Court dismissed the writ petition solely for lack of prosecution by the petitioner, who appeared to have lost interest in pursuing the matter on merits. The court deemed it unnecessary to examine the merits.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 14974 of 2005
Dt:25.11.2015
Between:
Sri Bhagwandas H.Makhija. And
… Petitioner
Government of A.P. and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 14974 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for the petitioner.
With the passage of time, the petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition further and hence, nobody is coming forward to work it out on merits. In the circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the
writ petition for non-prosecution.
Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:25.11.2015
kdl
Sri Bhagwandas H. Makhija
Government of A.P.
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
