Writ appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not press the appeal, stating a desire to apply afresh for layout approval. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions were also disposed of.
Writ appeal dismissed as not pressed; miscellaneous petitions disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No. 1502 of 2005
Dt:25.11.2015
Between:
C.Balakrishna. … Appellant And Tirupathi Urban Development Authority and others. … Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No. 1502 of 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the appellant does not press this appeal and submits that his client desires to apply afresh for approval of layout.
Writ appeal is dismissed as not pressed. If the appellant makes an application for approval of layout, the same may be considered strictly in
accordance with law.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:25.11.2015
kdl
C. Balakrishna
Tirupathi Urban Development Authority
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
