The High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 13264 of 2012 as infructuous based on the submission that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication. No order as to costs was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
*********
WP.No.13264 of 2012
Between:
Vankayala Sriram.
… Petitioner/Appellant (s)
and
The District Collector, Kakinada,
East Godavari District and four others.
… Respondent (s)
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 28.07.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.13264 OF 2012
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
28.07.2015
tk
Vankayala Sriram
The District Collector, Kakinada
East Godavari District and four others
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
