Disposed

R.Bhaskara Rao, v. H.Y.Dora

Telangana HC28 Jul 2015CC/515/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses a contempt petition under Sections 10-12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The court noted repeated adjournments to produce salary records and directed the second respondent to produce them within one week or appear personally.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to produce salary payment records within one week or appear personally before the court.

R.Bhaskara Rao, Vs H.Y.Dora — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA

¶2

PRADESH

¶3

(Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN

¶5

//PRESENT//

¶6

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: A. RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶7

CC. NO. 515 of 2014

¶8

Between:

¶9

1. R. Bhaskara Rao, S/o. R. Satyanarayana.

¶10

2. M. Guru Prasad, S/o. M. Guruvaiah.

¶11

3. Ch. C. Kasi Reddy, S/o. Kasi Reddy.

¶12

4. Ch.E.C.Vidyasagar, S/o. Ch. Sayanna

¶13

.. Petitioners

¶14

AND

¶15

1. H.Y. Dora, Chairman and Managing Director, the Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, Corporate Office, Tirupathi, Near Govindarajulu Arts College, Biragipattada Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.

¶16

2. K . Jayasekhar, Superintending Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, Ramnagar Main Road, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶17

…. Respondents

¶18

WHEREAS the Petitioners have presented above case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, through their Counsel Sri V. Venugopala Rao, praying the High Court to summon the respondents No. 1 and 2 and to punish them for their willful disobedience of order of this Hon`ble Court passed in WPMP No. 6410 of 2014 in WP No. 5163 of 2014, dated: 24-02-2014;

¶19

WHEREAS the said case coming on for hearing on this day and whereas the High Court upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 02-04-2014, 26-12-2014, 23-01-2015 & 23-06-2015 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. Venugopala Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri P. Vinod Kumar, Advocate for the respondents, made the following

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

“Even though time is sought on the last two occasions for getting the record pertaining to the proof of payment of salaries, even today time is sought again for the same purpose.

¶22

Post after one (01) week for production of record. If the records are not produced by them, the second respondent shall be present in person before this Court along with the records on that day”.

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

2. K . Jayasekhar, Superintending Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, Ramnagar Main Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. (BY RPAD)

¶29

3. One CC to Sri V. Venugopala Rao, Advocate (OPUC)

¶30

4. One CC to Sri P. Vinod Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)

¶31

5. One Spare Copy Ksv

¶32

HIGH COURT

¶33

Ksv Date of drafting: 24-07-2015

¶34

ARRJ

¶35

DATE: 20-06-2015

¶36

NOTE: POST AFTER ONE (01)WEEK

¶37

ORDER

¶38

CC. NO. 515 OF 2014

¶39

DIRECTION

R.Bhaskara Rao, v. H.Y.Dora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Bhaskara Rao, v. H.Y.Dora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kasireddy Ram Bangarayya Swachandha Seva Sangham Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kasireddy Ram Bangarayya Swachandha Seva Sangham Vs Vijayawada Municipal Corporation

Medisetti Srikanth, Vs Somesh Kumar

Vegi Satyavathi Vs Mandal Parishad Development Officer

Mr. Inder Krishnamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Vankayala Sriram, Vs The District Collector