The Metropolitan Commissioner, v. L.Bharath Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ appeal was disposed of as withdrawn upon the counsel's prayer.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
The writ appeal was disposed of as withdrawn upon the counsel's prayer.
Writ appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No.389 of 2015
Dt:04.06.2015
Between:
The Metropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority,
Tarnaka, Hyderabad and another.
… Appellant
And
L.Bharath Reddy and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No.389 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.V.Narasimha Goud, learned counsel for the appellants (respondent Nos.3 and 4 in W.A.No.367 of 2015), prays for withdrawal of the writ appeal.
Writ appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Dt:04.06.2015
kdl
The Metropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Tarnaka, Hyderabad and another
L.Bharath Reddy and others
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court