Appeals challenging an order granting interim admission direction were not pressed by the appellant. Bench disposed of appeals without adjudicating merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APEAL Nos. 396, 397 AND 398 OF 2015
03-06-2015
Between:
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, rep., by its Registrar N.V. Ramana Rao, S/o. NVRLN Rao, aged about 54 years, Occupation: Registrar, JNTU-H, Resident of JNTU quarters, JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
… Appellant
And
Akhil Goud and three others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APEAL Nos. 396, 397 AND 398 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In all the writ appeals, the appellant – University has challenged similar order which reads thus:
“Notice before admission.
There shall be interim direction as prayed for.
Post after Summer Vacation of 2015.”
By virtue of this order, learned counsel for the appellant – University fairly states that all the respondents – students have appeared for the examination. In view thereof, he does not press these appeals and seeks liberty to the University to file counter and seek expeditious hearing of the writ petitions and/or file miscellaneous petitions for appropriate relief.
Writ appeals are disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. All contentions on merits are kept open.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
03-06-2015
ks
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
Akhil Goud and three others
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
