The High Court closed the Public Interest Litigation accepting the petitioner's submission that the petition could not be maintained in view of subsequent developments, allowing a fresh petition to be filed.
Writ petition closed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 92 OF 2015
DATE: 13.04.2015
Between:
A. Hazarathaiah
… Petitioner
And
The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 92 of 2015
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the subsequent development this writ petition cannot be maintained.
Accepting his prayer, we close the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition in accordance with law, as may be advised.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 13.04.2015
ES
A. Hazarathaiah
The State of A.P.
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
