Dismissed
Patthi Raithula Shankeshama Sangam v. The Government of India
Telangana HCPIL/75/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE
OF ANDHRA PRADESH
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE
CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.75 of 2012
DATED: 20-04-2015
Between:
Patthi Raithula Shankeshama Sangam .. Petitioner
And
The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Co-operation rep. by its
Secretary and others
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.75 OF 2012
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
It is represented on behalf of Sri J. Ramachandra Rao, learned counsel who appeared for the petitioner earlier, that he has given a ‘no objection’ vakalat. However, we find that the said ‘no objection vakalat’ has not been acted upon till date. It is further stated that the petitioner has also been informed that the
learned counsel can no longer continue to represent it.
In that view of the matter, the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed for nonprosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
SANJAY KUMAR, J 20-04-2015
Svv
Patthi Raithula Shankeshama Sangam
Government of India
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court