Petitioner in Public Interest Litigation No. 348 of 2015 prayed for withdrawal of the petition. The High Court of Hyderabad dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of related miscellaneous petitions.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
P.I.L. No.348 of 2015
DATED: 23.11.2015
Between:
Syed Mohammed Abdul Samad and The State of Telangana and others
… Petitioner
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
P.I.L. No.348 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this PIL.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
23rd NOVEMBER, 2015.
S. RAVI KUMAR, J
kvni
Syed Mohammed Abdul Samad
State of Telangana and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
