The petitioner, in person, did not press PIL No.287 of 2015 on merits after placing a representation with the Election Commission. The court disposed of the PIL and miscellaneous petitions as not pressed.
Disposal of PIL No.287 of 2015 and connected miscellaneous petitions as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.287 of 2015
Dt:23.11.2015
Between:
J.Ram Mohan Chowdhary.
… Petitioner
And
The Union of India and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.287 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
The petitioner-in-person has placed on record, a representation, dated 08.10.2015, made to the Chief Election Commissioner. In the representation, he
has made similar grievance as made in the PIL. He prays for direction to the Election Commission of India to consider his representation on merits in accordance with law. He does not press the PIL on merits.
PIL is disposed of as not pressed. We hope and trust that the Election Commission of India shall consider the petitioner’s representation on merits in accordance with law expeditiously. This order shall not be construed as direction as such to the Election Commission of India.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.RAVI KUMAR, J
Dt:23.11.2015
kdl
J.Ram Mohan Chowdhary
The Union of India and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
