Petitions challenging the empanelment of social activists in a government programme committee were dismissed as covered by two prior orders, with no merits examined.
The writ petitions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
P.I.L. No.255 OF 2014, W.P. Nos.32369 AND 28194 OF 2014
COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
Heard learned counsel appearing for parties and the learned Special Government Pleader.
The substantive prayer in these writ petitions is against inclusion or empanelment of social activists in the Committee constituted for implementation of a Government sponsored programme “Janma Bhoomi-Maa Vooru” in terms of G.O.Ms.No.135 dated 17.09.2014, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.
The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the substantive prayer in these writ petitions is covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.36930 of 2014 and P.I.L.No.94 of 2015.
By accepting the statement, the writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed of. No costs.
DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V.BHATT, J
Date: 05.10.2015
Stp
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
