Short order disposing of a Public Interest Litigation not pressed by the petitioner. Disposition includes liberty to implead in a related writ petition.
PIL disposed of as not pressed with liberty to implead in W.P.No.35104 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
P.I.L No. 231 OF 2015
29-10-2015
Between: Mir Ashfaq Ali Khan, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
P.I.L No. 231 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this PIL and seeks liberty to the petitioner to seek his impleadment as party respondent in W.P.No.35104 of 2013.
PIL is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the petitioner are kept open.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J
29-10-2015 va
Mir Ashfaq Ali Khan
State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
