Dismissed
Pallampati Sambasiva Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Industries and Commerce
Telangana HCPIL/247/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 247 OF 2015
Date: 23.11.2015
Between:
Pallampati Sambasiva Rao & another.
… Petitioner
And
The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce (Mines-IV) Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 247 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue placed on record order, dated 25.09.2015, issued by District Collector and Chairman, District Level Sand Committee, Guntur, cancelling the order dated 06.08.2015, of District Panchayat Officer and Member Convenor, District Level Sand Committee, Guntur, which is the subject matter of the instant public interest litigation. By the order, dated 06.08.2015, respondent No.8 was granted permission to extract ordinary sand.
In view of the order, dated 25.09.2015, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the public interest litigation.
Public interest litigation is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S. RAVI KUMAR, J
Date: 23.11.2015
ES
Pallampati Sambasiva Rao & another.
The State of A.P.
Dilip B. Bhosale
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court