PIL No. 178 of 2015 filed by Haneef Ali was withdrawn unconditionally by the petitioner. The Hon'ble Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 178 OF 2015
13-07-2015
Between: Haneef Ali
… Petitioner
And
Union of India, rep., by Ministry of Human Resource and Development, C-wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi, India and four others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 178 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
We have perused the nature of prayer made in the public interest litigation (PIL). Having regard thereto and considering the status of the petitioner, we direct him to deposit Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with the Registrar (Judicial), to show his bona fides, within a period of two weeks from today. If the petitioner fails to deposit the amount within the stipulated time, the PIL shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without reference to the Court. If the amount is deposited, Office is directed to place this PIL for admission on 27-07-2015.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the PIL unconditionally.
PIL is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J
13-07-2015 ks
Haneef Ali
Union of India
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
