affidavit resisted the said application. At the time of enquiry, in the first instance, only exhibits P1 to P3 were marked on the side of the plaintiff and no exhibits were marked on the side of the defendants. The trial Court by an order dated 08.04.2008 allowed the application of the plaintiff and had granted a temporary injunction as prayed for while extending the earlier interim orders granted on 23.10.2007 till the disposal of the suit. Feeling aggrieved of the said orders, the defendants had filed C.M.A.No.6 of 2011; and, that C.M.A was dismissed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sathupalli, by orders dated 22.02.2013. Feeling aggrieved of the said orders, the defendants had filed C.R.P.No.1253 of 2013 before this Court and this Court, by orders dated 07.08.2014, had allowed the said revision and had set aside the order of the learned Senior Civil Judge and remitted the matter to the learned Senior Civil Judge for fresh disposal on merits and in accordance with the procedure established by law. After such remand, the defendants had filed forty-two documents on their side. No further documents are filed on behalf of the plaintiff. On merits, the learned Senior Civil Judge, had passed the impugned order dated 20.07.2015 dismissing C.M.A.No.6 of 2011 and confirming the order of the trial Court dated 08.04.2008, whereby a temporary injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaint schedule property pending final disposal of the suit. Therefore, the unsuccessful defendants are before this Court.
