Anantapur, which is referred to supra, to proceed in a scientific manner while implementing the terms of the award. And, according to the submissions of the learned counsel for the defendants, the course suggested in the report of the said Industrial Consultancy Service if followed, it would inure to the benefit of both the parties. The learned counsel for the plaintiff did not dispute the report of the expert on any grounds. Having perused the report which is placed on record along with the material papers filed by the defendants herein, this Court is satisfied that the defendants’ approach in the matter is fair and merits consideration and that the defendants can be permitted to proceed with the implementation of the terms of the award as per the guidelines given by the expert viz., Industrial Consultancy Services. The ends of justice would be met, if it is observed that while implementing the terms of the award, the defendants shall follow the guidelines given in the report furnished by the Industrial Consultancy Services, JNTU College of Engineering, Anantapur signed by the Principal viz., the report given in response to letter ref. Nil, dated 02.07.2015, which is enclosed to the letter in RC. AN/CEA/ICS/S.M. LAB/T-413 15, dated 15.07.2015. Thus, this Court finds that the plaintiff had not made out valid and sufficient grounds and had not satisfied the cardinal principles for grant of an equitable relief and that there are no grounds to interfere with the order impugned. However, the appeal can be disposed of by giving necessary directions, as desired by both the sides as such a course sub serves the ends of justice.
