The Court disposed of a civil revision petition concerning delays in a suit pending for nearly eight years, noting the petitioner's counsel contributed to the delay.
Civil Revision Petition No.1413 of 2015 disposed of; pending miscellaneous petitions also disposed of; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Civil Revision Petition No.1413 of 2015
Between:
Lanka Sreenu
…. Petitioner
Vs.
Pediredla Ramana
…. Respondent
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 14.08.2015.
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Civil Revision Petition No.1413 of 2015
ORDER:
The report submitted by the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam shows that the delay in disposal of the Suit is also because the counsel for the revision petitioner was also not ready to proceed with the trial of the Suit. While it would be wholly inappropriate for this Court to fix a time frame for the Senior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam to dispose of the Suit, I have no reason to doubt that, since the Suit relates to the year 2007 and has been pending on the file of the Court below for nearly 8 years, the Suit would be decided with utmost expedition.
The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall also stand disposed of. No costs.
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
Date:14.08.2015.
cs
Lanka Sreenu
Pediredla Ramana
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
