Allowed

Ganta Padmaja , Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh through SHO

Telangana HC20 Jan 2015CRLP/53/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners under Section 438 CrPC in event of arrest in Crime No. 457 of 2014, directed police to comply with Supreme Court decision in Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014.

What did the court decide?

Released petitioners on bail in event of arrest; directed respondent to comply with Supreme Court decision in Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014.

Ganta Padmaja , Padma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh… — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRL.P. No. 53 of 2015

¶2

Between:1.Ganta Padmaja @ Padma W/o. Srinivasa Rao 2.Ganta Venkateswara Rao S/o. Venkat Rao 3.Ganta Baby Sridevi W/o. Venkateswara Rao. ..... Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 to 5 in Crime No. 457 of 2014 on the file of Ongole Taluk Police Station, Prakasam District.

¶3

AND

¶4

The state of Andhra Pradesh, through SHO, Ongole Taluk Police Station, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor at High Court of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

¶5

..Respondent/Complainant.

¶6

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in

¶7

the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on anticipatory bail in Crime No. 457 of 2014, dated : 28-08-2014 of Ongoel Taluk P.S. Prakasam District, in the event of their arrest in connection with above crime and further direct the respondent/police to comply with the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 1277 of 2014, Dt : 02-07-2014.

¶8

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. Ravi Prasad, Advocate for the

¶9

Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor(AP) on behalf of respondent-State, the Court made the following

¶10

ORDER:-

¶11

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶12

//TRUE COPY//

¶13

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶14

¶15

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole. 2.The II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3.The Station House Officer, Ongole Taluq Police Station, Prakasam District.(Cr.No. 457/2014) 4.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor(AP), High Court at Hyd(OUT) 5.One CC to Sri N. Ravi Prasad, Advocate (OPUC) 6.One Spare Copy.

TKK

HIGH COURT

CPK.J

DT.20-01-2015.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶21

CRL.P.No. 53 of 2015

¶22

RELEASE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST.

¶23

DRAFTED BY TKK DT.21-01-2015.

HIGH COURT

CPK.J

DT.20-01-2015.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶28

CRL.P.No. 53 of 2015

¶29

RELEASE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST.

Ganta Padmaja , Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh through SHO

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganta Padmaja , Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh through SHO

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abu Bakar , Munna, Vs The State of A.P.

Vetgiri Madhusudhan Rao , Madhu, Vs The State of Telangana

Raman Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri. Beeda Ravi Chandra Vs Sri Mutyala Bala Rami Reddy

Dunna Laxamma Vs The State of Telangana

Thummala Venkata Kavya Suvarchal, Vs Chalamcharla Kodanarami Reddy [died]