This order dismissed a criminal petition at the admission stage because prima facie accusation warranted continued investigation and quashing was inappropriate. The court directed police not to arrest Accused Nos. 2 and 3 while they cooperate with investigators.
Non-arrest of Accused Nos. 2 and 3 during investigation; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2222 of 2015
ORDER:
Upon hearing both sides, at the admission stage, the following Order is passed:
Having regard to the prima facie accusation contained in the F.I.R and as the investigation is in progress, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings. Therefore, the investigation shall be continued to its logical end. However, considering the request of the learned counsel for petitioners, the Police of Gachibowli, Cyderabad, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, are directed not to arrest the petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No.3 of 2015 during the course of investigation. The petitioners shall cooperate with the investigating agency for smooth completion of investigation.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
30-03-2015
eha
77
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2222 of 2015
Dt. 30.03.2015
eha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed or investigation continued with non-arrest of accused.
Whether the petitioners should be released from arrest during investigation.
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
