The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall of witnesses. The Court held that the trial court provided sound reasoning for dismissal, rendering the current petition not a fit case for quashing. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Petition dismissed; no remedies granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2015
ORDER:
At the admission stage, the following order is passed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order.
A perusal of the impugned order dated 28.10.2014 in Crl.M.P.No. 2394 of 2014 in C.C.No. 216 of 2009, would show that the trial court has given sound reasoning for dismissal of the petition filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 311 Cr.P.C, requesting to recall PW-2 and PW-4 for further cross-examination and as such, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 17.03.2015 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the petition under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is a fit case to quash the proceedings.
Petitioner/Accused
State
U. Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
