Court declined to quash criminal proceedings against petitioners A.4 and A.5 as cognizance was already taken against them. Directed release of N.B.Ws upon appearance before trial court by March 31, 2015.
Directed recall of N.B.Ws against Petitioners/A.4 & A.5 upon appearance before trial court by 31-03-2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1703 of 2015
ORDER:
Upon hearing both sides, at the admission stage, the following Order is passed:
Since the trial Court has taken cognizance against A.1 to A.5 including the present petitioners/A.4 and A.5, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the present Petitioners/A.4 and 5. However, if the petitioners are so advised, they can move discharge applications before the trial Court, in which case, the trial Court shall dispose of the said discharge applications on merits at the earliest. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the trial Court while taking cognizance of the Charge sheet issued N.B.Ws against the present Petitioners. Now, the learned counsel for petitioners prayed to order recalling of said N.B.Ws.
Considering it, the petitioners/A.4 & 5 are directed to appear before the trial Court on or before 31-03-2015 and on their appearance, the learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kadapa, shall recall the N.B.Ws issued against them.
With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
eha.
17-03-2015
22
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1703 of 2015
Dt. 17.03.2015
eha
Petitioners/A.4 and A.5
A.1 to A.3
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
