The court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal for non-prosecution as no representation was filed despite listing the matter for dismissal on 19.06.2015.
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.M.S.A. No.89 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:
Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal shall stand closed.
__________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 19.06.2015 MVA
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.M.S.A. No.89 OF 2013
Date: 19.06.2015
MVA
M.Satyannarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
