The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution. The appellant failed to appear or make representation when the matter was listed for dismissal.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; pending petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.2691 of 2004
JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
As there was no representation for the appellant on 21.01.2015, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”.
2. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH
REDDY
___________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO 22.01.2015. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.2691 of 2004
22.01.2015 Msr
R. Subhash Reddy
B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
