Counsel filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the appeal suit, citing that the matter was settled. The Court accorded permission and dismissed the appeal suit as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal suit; appeal suit dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
APPEAL SUIT No.99 of 2013
Between :
Palla Seetha Rama Nageswara Rao
And two others.
… Appellants/Defendants
AND
The Corporate People rep. by its Partners,
Vijaywada and another
… Respondent
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 21.07.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTH
1. W h e t h e r Reporters of Local Yes/No newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may Yes/No be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Wh e th e r Their Ladyship/Lordship Yes/No wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APPEAL SUIT No.99 of 2013
JUDGMENT :
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a letter dated 20.07.2015 in the registry, seeking permission of this Court to with the appeal suit as the matter is settled out of the Court. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
21st July 2015.
mar
Palla Seetha Rama Nageswara Rao
The Corporate People rep. by its Partners, Vijaywada
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
